25 Nov 2018
Just so you understand the context behind this case study, this is a company I used to work for and had been trying to launch their website for 22 months. Yes, you read that correctly. 22 months. The original draft of the site was ready in November..
Blog
Just so you understand the context behind this case study, this is a company I used to work for and had been trying to launch their website for 22 months. Yes, you read that correctly. 22 months.
The original draft of the site was ready in November 2016 and I left the company in September 2018, still without having made the new site live. I almost wish I could say I was partly to blame, but I wasn't.
Anyway, one of the key things I had warned about for the 22 months was that their existing site, despite it being old, antiquated, in a CMS that couldn't be edited and connected to an ordering system no-one else in the company was capable of changing, it ranked really well for certain high traffic terms.
This was good news.
All they needed to do when moving sites is to make sure that they let Google know that the high ranking pages that used to be in one place and optimised for that keyword - 'mobility aids' - were now somewhere else. Not a massively hard job. Probably an hour or two at the most.
It was the sort of thing I was there to manage. And then I left.
And then this happened.
There's not even a way of framing this result that doesn't use the word 'disaster'. One minute, top ten - around the 5th point - the next, below 70. Ker-rash.
That's 1,900 POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS PER MONTH that are no longer coming to this website.
Let's maybe put that in commercial terms.
With a new website, we could have potentially got higher than 5th. So maybe 3rd, maybe 2nd. Let's say we could have captured 300 of those visits. 300 visitors that aren't being exposed to the brand. Or spending over $100 on products. Could that be $30,000 in lost sales EVERY MONTH?
Maybe. Maybe not. Not everyone would have purchased. But this is a very niche market so the conversion rate would have been higher than normal e-commerce.
Either way, this is a huge cock-up.
On the plus side, it could be recoverable. A short enough time has passed that Google won't necessarily have abandoned all that link juice from that original page so a team who knew what they were doing could potentially save the situation.
But this is a stark lesson that anyone who simply turns one site off and turns another one on, can potentially do irreparable damage to traffic and revenue.
Photo by Rob Potter on Unsplash
Here are some suggested articles that are closely related to this post
If your company has more than one brand, or more than one business channel, there's probably been a discussion around whether each of those brands or channels should have their own standalone websites, or they should all be combined into one. This...
This is actually one of my favourite case studies with a client because, well, you just have to look at the pattern of the journey we went on with this one - it was somewhat of a rollercoaster. As you can imagine, there's a great narrative behind...
So, you’ve just spent a chunk of cash building a super slick new website for your business. You probably did some competitor research, looked at a range of sites for inspiration, and reviewed a number of different design concepts. Perhaps you even...
What happens when you track a keyword that's been left to fend for itself? Well, that's what SEO Case Study 5 is all about. There's a couple of keywords I've been monitoring on a client website that I haven't been doing any work on. Why would I...
There's only so much where you can talk about other people's SEO without showing everyone how well you do with your own. So here it is: the plumber reveals the state of his own pipes in our SEO case study #7. For those unfamiliar with Google...
https://youtu.be/x1jJLGInzAE Transcript for SEO Job Interview Questions Welcome to my video, five questions to ask your next SEO candidate. My name is Simon Dell. I am the CEO of Cemoh We are about really good marketing people. We do two.